0769-7151602

当前位置:主页 > 新闻中心

TA:因现代足球重视边路与攻防转换,菱形中场阵型已几乎绝迹(TA:边路与攻防转换当道,菱形中场阵型几近消失)

时间:2026-01-14 来源:麻将胡了

Analyzing midfield formations

The user has made an observation in Chinese about the decline of the diamond midfield formation in modern football due to a focus on wing play and transitions. I think they might want some commentary or discussion on this tactical analysis. I could explore if the diamond formation has truly vanished, weighing its pros and cons, as well as modern uses in clubs like Ancelotti’s AC Milan and recent teams that have employed it. This could lead to a thoughtful analysis!Clarifying midfield formations

still

Okay, so Carlo Ancelotti primarily used a 4-3-3 but switched to a 4-4-2 diamond for the 2014-15 season with James as a tip. Real Madrid utilized the diamond in 2023-24 with Bellingham as the 10. Klopp's Liverpool tried a diamond early on in 2022-23. Other teams like Red Bull Salzburg have employed the diamond frequently. Still, it's important to note that some teams, like Inter under Inzaghi, haven’t used it. I should really clarify these formations and their use across different teams for a thoughtful analysis!Evaluating the diamond formation

The claim that the diamond formation is nearly extinct due to a preference for wing play and transitions is interesting. While it may not be as predominant, it's evolved into narrow shapes in possession with fullbacks supplying width. Teams like Salzburg and Benfica still utilize variations like 4-2-2-2 and narrow diamonds. For instance, Real Madrid in 2023-24 used a diamond behind two forwards, and Juventus had a diamond setup last season. I need to dive deeper into these examples to analyze the current trend!Challenging the diamond's extinction

默认阵型

Looking at examples like RB Salzburg in 2019-20 under Marsch, they utilized a 4-4-2 diamond focusing on central overloads for verticality and pressing, with fullbacks providing width. Their narrow shape can be effective during transitions due to central counterpressing. So, the argument that the diamond formation is extinct because modern football emphasizes transitions doesn't hold up as well as I thought. In fact, the diamond can maintain strength in central defensive zones, making it a viable option still!

li

不太同意“几乎绝迹”。更准确是:菱形从“常驻阵型”转为“阶段性结构/对策方案”。现代球更重视边路与攻防转换没错,但菱形通过角色调整依然能成立。

要点:

  • 权衡本质:菱形在中路压倒性人数优势(10号位+双“8”)换来边路天然变窄,要求边后卫与前锋去供宽、拉深。
  • 现代修正:用进攻期“满宽度”结构弥补——常见是菱形出球→压上形成2-3-5或3-2-5,靠插上的边后卫/一侧内锋去站边。防守期再落回4-3-1-2或4-4-2。
  • 转换强点:丢球反抢更近中路,二次球与直塞通道都在脚边;这与现代强调转换并不矛盾,甚至是优点。
  • 脆弱点:被对手双翼卫+快速转移打弱侧;边后卫体能与对抗要求极高;“8号位”要能长距离横移护边。
  • 适配清单:阵容缺强力传统边锋、但拥有强10号位/二前锋组合;希望中路逼抢与直塞渗透;对手习惯从中路组织而非强侧抽边。
  • 近期实例:皇马23/24大量使用4-4-2菱形(贝林厄姆为顶点,维尼修斯/罗德里戈为双前);波切蒂诺时期热刺在强强对话多次启用;奥地利萨尔茨堡、德甲多队在特定对手时用过菱形或其变体。
  • 形态进化:当下更常见“菱形—箱型”混合(4中场成菱形或箱型,随压上与回撤在两者间切换),而不是老派固定4-3-1-2整场不变。

结论:菱形没灭绝,只是不再当“默认阵型”。在合适的名单配置、清晰的供宽方案和高强度边后卫支持下,它仍是有效且常被轮换使用的工具。

hed

{Copyright 2024 麻将胡了(中国)官方网站 - PG麻将胡了中文网 PG MAHJONG All Rights by 麻将胡了